eBay reveals its apple ipad 2 sales data

eBay reveals its apple ipad 2 sales data Unsurprisingly the hard-to-gettablet might be moving briskly on your service, reaching just something like 12,000 sales at the two-week period within the U.S. launch and also iPad 2's launch in 25 additional international nexus 4 bumper countries.

What is surprising that time period is this : eBay's data shows a considerably higher percentage of iPads selling throughout the U.S. than the launch on the first-generation device. That number is 65 percent of sales vacationing in the U.S., rather than just 35 percent this coming year.

Nonetheless, people are exporting abroad, which eBay could have been tracking and plots outside in the infographic embedded below. Each of those biggest export locations are Canada and Russia, followed closely by Hong Kong, Japan, while the United Kingdom. Of special note is Russia, being the receiver of 500 iPad 2s, nexus 4 wallet case as opposed to 215 from the original device through same time in 2010. Last year's eBay iPad numbers had also pegged Russia given that the biggest importer of 16GB iPads, as well as the very best average mark-up to the 32GB model at nexus 4 case bumper $306 over retail. Electrical systems, the big droppers was Australia, which went from 317 units in last year's iPad to 110 with all the new model.

Two weeks of iPad 2 sales on eBay, and where they went. (Click to enlarge)

(Credit:eBay)

eBay averaged out of monatary amount of the numerous models (excluding color and type 3G), which sit well above Apple's own retail pricing. Which include, the 16GB Wi-Fi only apple ipad 2, which retails for $499 had a standard monatary amount of $697, and is $198 higher. It's going up from there, hitting a $264 premium in the 64GB model, plus a staggering $406 average premium on your top-of-the-line 64GB model with built-in 3G. A thought to not forget we have found that section of that amount finishes up likely to eBay available an inventory fee, and additionally just about any fees related to payment options or reserve fees. It could be a schedule, meaning not everyone was selling it inside same price.

As far considering that the more popular models, eBay delivers the entry-level 16GB model topping the charts at 30 % of sales, and the aforementioned 64GB 3G model at 23 percent. The 32GB Wi-Fi only model also comes in third place at 17 %. Kinds of least-liked models through looks with the data are the initial two models with 3G, while using the 16GB as well 32GB models 7 percent and 9 percent, respectively. However that could be due more to availability than user preference considering the popularity of the high-end model with 3G.

While eBay's numbers represent simply a little the estimated sales using the iPad 2 from Apple's retail stores in conjunction with other retailers, it has a very interesting observe which models are definitely the most in-demand and also how much users plan to pay as well as the cost to acheive their hands on one. Besides auctions, eBay in addition has jumped within the trade-in space, offering immediately Sale program that original iPad owners can ever choose to hand-off the sale to eBay in return for money up front. Inside the release preceding the U.S. launch associated with the iPad 2, the business announced that 38,000 Instant Sale offers was initially made on original iPads included in the program, with 22,000 individuals being stated in a few days following a iPad 2's announcement.

Embedded below is last year's chart for comparison:

Last years iPad eBay sales movement within your two week window following its launch from the U.S. (click to enlarge)

(Credit:eBay)

Incomes later, iPhone revenue hits $150 billion

Incomes later, iPhone revenue hits $150 billion Apple's iPhone was a sales juggernaut since its launch. Plus a new study research firm Strategy Analytics generally drive that point home.

Since the iPhone's launch nexus 4 bumper in June 2007, Apple has generated cumulative revenues of $150 billion, as reported by Strategy Analytics. Neil Shah, senior analyst at Strategy Analytics, told CNET within a phone conversation today which your number only includes hardware sales. Accessories, apps, and software and services, which typically represent 3 % to 5 percent of Apple's iPhone revenue each quarter, were factored out.

Moving on hardware units, Strategy Analytics declared 250 million iPhones have shipped globally.

Despite numerous very for Apple, your analysis firm is simply not necessarily positive that Apple can hold on the same a higher standard profits it easily has secured from the iPhone market within the last quite a few years.

Related storiesThe way forward for AppleiPhone 5 sales in China surpass 2 million in first weekendCop arrested with buying $15 iPhone -- from undercover copDo Make need insurance for my smartphone?Walmart selling iPhone 5 for $127 to get, 4S for $47

"There are emerging signs in which the iPhone's next a few years can get tougher," Strategy Analytics executive director Neil Mawston said today in an exceedingly statement. "Some mobile operators are case for nexus 4 increasingly becoming concered about our prime quantity subsidies they commit to the iPhone, while Samsung is expanding nexus 4 wallet case its popular Galaxy portfolio and providing Apple with credible competition."

According to Shah, the "concern" carriers are experiencing relates economics. He told CNET by investing in Apple's $600 wholesale iPhone price to carriers, companies like AT&T and Verizon have to have a $300 to $400 hit after sell it for $199 or $299 using a two-year contract. And Apple, considering that it "has the selling power," is unwilling to negotiate that pricing, Shah says.

It's a much different story for popularAndroid-based devices just like the HTC One X or perhaps the Samsung Galaxy S3. Shah told CNET that while the wholesale price for the Galaxy S3 is high -- he believes it can be $500 or $550 -- carriers are already in a negotiate that down to $400 , making the possibilities of them quickly getting their back better.

"The Galaxy S3 subsidy is considerably lower," Shah told CNET, adding that popular Android-based devices could create carriers think about playing so nicely with Apple.

Still, people are not so without doubt carriers are going to do much to modify things. During a research note published recently, Morgan Stanley analyst Katy Huberty stated that the 3 U.S. iPhone carriers are important by contract to be able to certain subsidies, circumstance agreements will remain in its place for a long. What's worse for carriers, the contracts won't expire also, effectively eliminating their prospects teaming through Apple to decrease subsidies.

Apple, meanwhile, cost nothing to keep at it to bring in the amount of money.

Appeals court upholds Apple victory in Cover Flow patent case

Appeals court upholds Apple victory in Cover Flow patent case Apple has internet site been cleared of infringing on patents held by Mirror Worlds.

In a ruling posted today with nexus 4 wallet case the U.S. Court of Appeals in your Federal Circuit in Washington, a legal court upheld (PDF) the lowest court decision from April 2011, which sided with Apple.

Mirror Worlds originally accused Apple of infringing on its patents with features constructed into itsMac OS X systems time for 10.4 "Tiger," while in the its iOS devices just like iPhone,iPod, andiPad. The firm, which has been founded by Yale University computer-science professor David Gelernter, took aim at Apple's Cover Flow, Spotlight, and Time Machine features designed on devices running various iterations of their software.

Part of this Mirror Worlds patent for streaming files.

(Credit:Mirror Worlds)

A jury initially found Apple responsible for infringement in October 2010 and tallied up damages greater than $625 million. Apple responded by saying the damages were too high and urged the court to re-evaluate the nexus 4 case evidence. Few months later, U.S. District Judge Leonard Davis sided with Apple and reversed choosing one, noting that although the jury's fight situation was important, the group could have been swayed by Mirror Worlds' argument, in which the court said lacked foundation.

"In this example, Mirror Worlds may have painted a unique picture for jury, even so it neglected to lay a good all round foundation sufficient to back up important elements rrt had been need to establish plantar to law," Judge Davis wrote fix your vision ..

Mirror Worlds then appealed, which led as much today's decision.

The spat is truly one of many between Apple among other technology companies where custom nexus 4 case huge amount of money arrived at stake. A high-profile trial between Apple and Samsung involving patents (amongst other things) recently upped the ante in the field, leaving Samsung for the hook for upwards of $1 billion following jury found it to infringe on several Apple patents across multiple handsets. Similar to the Mirror Worlds case, it too tends headed to put appeal.

Bloomberg first reported the ruling earlier today.

Apple hiring marketing manager for iBookstore

Apple hiring marketing manager for iBookstore Perhaps signaling that it can be acquiring serious about selling e-books, Apple is within the steps involved in choosing a U.S. marketing manager ready for its iBookstore.

The position is predicated in Cupertino and depending on the job posting, "It might be this Manager's responsibility to drive awareness and sales of iBooks through co-marketing programs with publishers and authors, strategic partnerships, and via on the internet direct marketing tactics."

Apple is exceedingly specific on the kind person it wants. It says that, "The role requires an entrepreneurial self-starter of your creativity and enthusiasm to offer innovative, impactful, and cost-effective programs to further build the iBooks business in the US. This experience will be combined with business acumen to use partner marketing negotiations with publishers and media partners." Applicants has to have an in-depth and thorough guidance for the publishing industry in addition to the effective techniques of marketing books working with publishing houses.

Apple has sold over three million iPads and iBooks ranks presents itself the freeiPad apps list. However if you both Amazon'sKindle and Barnes & Noble's Nook apps around for the iPad, iPhone, Designer Nexus 4 Case andiPod Touch, it's unclear how well the iBookstore is definitely doing and anecdotal evidence from self-published authors suggests Apple has a lot of work you want to do to catch up to its rivals, particularly Amazon.

While Apple is facing a truly competitive landscape inside U.S.--and that is a little surprising it hadn't filled this kind of key role custom nexus 4 case sooner--it's worth noting that it is quietly preparing a push onto the e-book market in countries to everyone. Recently, it hired an iBookstore manager on your UK, Canada, and Nexus 4 Leather Case features posted job listings for managers in France and Germany, and in many cases Australia. To be sure, Apple doesn't think small.

Comments?

Apple buys map service to contend with Google?

Apple buys map service to contend with Google? We could now take over a significantly better notion of why Apple objects to Google Latitude.

It appears that Apple has purchased PlaceBase, a specialist that produced a maps API called Pushpin and offered a mapping service nexus 4 wallet case almost like Google Maps. The evidence, dug up by ComputerWorld's Seth Weintraub, first appeared such as a tweet in July by Fred Lalonde, the founding father of Openspaces.org, an expert that used PlaceBase's software, praoclaiming that Apple had purchased PlaceBase:

Apple bought PlaceBase - all hush hush. Pushpin site taken offline. google nexus 4 case Hyperlocal iPhone?

The next clue apparently begun Jaron Waldman, PlaceBase's founder and CEO. His LinkedIn page now lists PlaceBase under his "past" experience currently lists his current occupation as the part of Apple's "GEO Team." Furthermore, Placebase.com and Pushpin.com are actually taken down.

All this leads you are convinced that Apple has nabbed PlaceBase. However, Apple representatives would not immediately subside with requests for comment.

Not long afterwards Apple's reported acquiring PlaceBase in July, Google released a version of its Latitude mobile application with the iPhone. But Apple, curiously, decreed that turn into Web-based app without having it a local iPhone app, which raised some eyebrows.

The application, that allows certainly show your physical location on top of a map guaranteeing that friends will find you, works much the same way as on other platforms likeAndroid, Symbian, BlackBerry, and Windows Mobile. The massive exception for your iPhone version is basically have to use the service in best nexus 4 case theSafari Web browser.

At the right time, Google explained the situation this particular way: "After we designed a Latitude application within the iPhone, Apple requested we release Latitude being a Web application to counteract confusion with Maps relating to the iPhone, which uses Google to serve maps tiles."

Apple's rationale apparently was that searchers would get confused from a Google Maps app and also a Google Latitude app. Easier explanation seemed a tiny bit baffling, since customer confusion didn't seem to be a worry when Apple approved perhaps 13 To-Do List applications and 30 streaming music apps.

However, the apparent getting PlaceBase usually explain why Apple would place such restrictions on Google--Apple offers a similar feature coming for your iPhone that barefoot running doesn't want competition for.

The Google Latitude episode is simply the latest spat regarding the two companies. Similar month that Apple said no to Google Latitude, Apple rejected the Google Voice application by reviewing the App Store, as stated by a letter Google transport to the government Communications Commission. The FCC is investigating the situation along with requested information from Apple, Google, and New iphone4 partner AT&T.

A week after news through the FCC investigation broke, Apple announced that Google CEO Eric Schmidt may be resigning from the board of directors. Schmidt, who had served on Apple's board for exactly 3 years, said in July he was likely to discuss the way forward for his role on Apple's board considering the creation of Chrome OS, an computer that expanded the fields where the two companies compete.

Apple and Samsung in order to satisfy in court for settlement chat

Apple and Samsung in order to satisfy in court for settlement chat A stop as to what is currently an ugly, complicated, and costly court battle between Apple and Samsung could be around the corner.

The two companies commit to meet of court go over any settlement with their legal fracas, that focused on intellectual property.

In a court ruling issued today -- relayed by intellectual-property blog FOSS Patents -- U.S. District Court judge Lucy Koh referred kinds of companies to your magistrate judge settlement conference designed to come about over the following Three months.

According in to the referral, both Samsung's and Apple's CEOs will be during the settlement session, as well as their general counsels.

The news follows a report recently saying top-level executives at both companies were warming in the notion of discussing "potential settlement" options.

"Apple CEO Tim Cook would not apparently share his predecessor's passion about laying all foes to waste," Bloomberg said, citing that information from an unnamed source. "Cook appears to view litigation in the form of necessary evil, google nexus 4 case not really vehicle of cosmic revenge."

In Walter Isaacson's authorized biography on Health-related reasons released recently, the late Apple co-founder viewed Google'sAndroid the gw990 to provide a "stolen" product, turning it into a non-public mission to wipe it out.

"I will expend my last dying breath should i really need to, i will spend every penny of Apple's $40 billion secured, to right this wrong," Jobs told Isaacson. "I'm visiting destroy Android, since it is a stolen product. I'm in a position to go thermonuclear fight against this."

Apple proceeded to use are designed for Android first through HTC, later expanding its efforts to Samsung, frist by a case that accused the Korea-based technology company of copying the planning, feel, and underlying technologies of the iPhone andiPad.

Related storiesApple and Samsung tend to make nice in patent warsSteve Jobs felt Android was obviously a 'stolen product'Apple, Samsung: Tons of handset earnings are are part of usWhy Apple, Samsung's phones sit atop piles of funding (FAQ)

The legal battle is of intense interest due to the method of trading in between the two companies. While Apple and Samsung tackle eath other fiercely for consumer dollars and share of the market, Samsung's components have already been the backbone of range of Apple's most desirable products. E . g ., the processor and screen in Apple's latest iPad are Samsung-made. Samsung also supplies components for Apple's iPhone, and itsMac computer line.

As mentioned in the past coverage, Apple has struck cross-licensing agreements with foes not that long ago. That includes a patent cope with Microsoft throughout the its purchase of Apple in 1997, not to mention one with Nokia next year that gave custom nexus 4 case the professionals the opportunity to license certain patents from another.

Apple declined to comment at night filing.

Samsung sent this statement to CNET on April 19, affirming what was earlier reported: "At the direction of this U.S. District Court for this Northern District of California, Samsung and Apple have allowed us enjoy a Magistrate Judge Settlement Conference. This settlement conference may take place within 90 days, making use of presence associated with party's ceo Nexus 4 Leather Case and general counsel."

Updated at 12:23 p.m. PT April 17 with a lot more background.

Updated at 7:30 a.m. April 19 with statement from Samsung contributed to end of story.

Apple and AT&T playing favorites with the App Store?

Apple and AT&T playing favorites with the App Store? Apple rejected original version for the application Sling submitted to the App Store that required use of the phone's 3G Gucci iphone 5 case service, in line with Sling. It was subsequently subsequently approved when it's modified then it will exclusively use local Wi-Fi hot spots. Apple's exact basis for rejecting it's just not clear. There are several video- and audio-streaming applications now available in Apple's App Store, from smaller streaming services like Orb and Last.fm (owned by CNET News publisher CBS Interactive), and heavyweights like MLB.com's At Bat, CBS' TV.com, and YouTube.

While Apple has not been shy about exercising its veto management of App Store applications--just ask Trent Reznor, for example--it's unclear why Sling's streaming video service is it being treated differently from, say, the YouTube app (owned by Apple-friendly Google), that is on the iPhone as the device's launch.

Apple did not reply to requests for comment about why about the Wi-Fi version of SlingPlayer was approved. But it appears the rejection also happens to be at AT&T's behest. At the outset of April, AT&T changed its terms of use for wireless customers, proclaiming that redirecting TV video or audio signals--as the SlingPlayer does--was not necessarily allowed on its network. Following public outcry, AT&T quickly reversed its decision, citing "a mistake." However , last month this agency reinstated the ban in its TOS.

Then on Friday, AT&T mobility spokesman Mark Siegel followed the Clark Howard radio show and also clearly asserted "Slinging"--the steps involved in accessing a TV signal in the Slingbox in a remote computer--was banned relating to the company's network.

Siegel compared using Sling's service for a wireless link with sending bulk e-mail and spam, activities that he said take excessive network's bandwidth. "You can't have a service called 'Slinging,' in which you redirect an invisible TV signal for your phone. And we don't allow that distinct application on our phones," he explained. "It's absolutely cool (technology), but in case we allowed these types of services, the highway would get clogged."

SlingPlayer for iPhone

(Credit:Screenshot by Erica Ogg/CNET)

He confirmed again to CNET News on Tuesday that AT&T believes the SlingPlayer app would take up more bandwidth than it should. To always be fair AT&T comes with a legitimate point. Streaming video Gucci iPad Mini Case uses a lot of bandwidth. Because cellular networks are split into cells, users inside a particular cell share the accessible bandwidth for the reason that cell or region. So users streaming plenty of high-quality video along the network could take the entire available bandwidth and degrade service for other subscribers in something cell.

But a large slight disconnect with the information AT&T says and the reason doing: Other 3G smartphones that are powered by AT&T's network may use the SlingPlayer. For illustration, the SlingPlayer creates several BlackBerry devices, the BlackBerry Bold, BlackBerry Pearl 8120, BlackBerry Curve 8320, also, the BlackBerry 8820. Users can download the mobile SlingPlayer application from the Sling Media Websites onto their phones.

Siegel says that AT&T's relation to its use are clear when the SlingPlayer when he demonstrates that anyone downloading these applications onto a smartphone in the package over its 3G network is located Louis vuitton ipad case in violation on the company's relation to its use.

Bandwidth usage could be a legitimate concern when you're thinking of SlingPlayer. The application is made to provide the high quality video experience for the way much bandwidth is obtainable. But Dave Eyler, product manager for mobile at Sling Media, testified that the newest version within the SlingPlayer listed in Apple to your App Store capped the part rate to be sure of it was actually below Apple's and AT&T's threshold. He said in which the application actually works with a little less bandwidth than TV.com's application.

"Our latest application, which had been submitted for App Store, is it is in the bit rate that Apple has set for these kind of applications," he was quoted saying. "And you're below most of the apps where there are also been approved with the App Store."

So why won't Apple encourage the SlingPlayer for the iPhone for use over AT&T's network whether or not it doesn't eat up any bandwidth than other video applications which use long been approved by Apple?

That's a really good question. Eyler said the reason presented to his team was that AT&T doesn't allow video services that redirect TV signals onto their network. But interestingly, OrbLive, that is certainly offered over the App Store, also redirects TV signals onto the iPhone. The job is designed to allow people to stream media in a PC for your iPhone wirelessly. Additionally the company's website online explicitly states that reside TV could be streamed over 3G, Wi-Fi, or even slower 2.5G EDGE network, company is a TV tuner card in the PC. This essentially "turns your iPhone oriPod touch into an on-demand media center," the location says.

OrbLive's application sounds very much like just what the SlingPlayer does. Eyler admits the relationship is confusing as well as bit frustrating. But he states the company isn't getting too bent off form about things.

"We think our app is awesome," he said. "There is a lot of Wi-Fi to choose from. After all, we want it to be positioned on a 3G network, and that is ultimately our goal. But i don't need to have any additional information about the making decisions process."

Update 11:02 a.m. PDT: This still leaves the question of why. Sling was bought by EchoStar, people who just love Dish Network, in 2007. Sling sells standalone Slingboxes, but Dish Network now also has integrated Slingbox capabilities inside combination satellite TV/DVR boxes. That suggests AT&T and Echostar both sell TV subscription services with DVR capabilities. But Dish's product may very well be considered by some consumers to stay superior due to the Sling capability. Handicapping that capability located on the iPhone would cut into that perceived superiority. It's unclear if you can find a direct connection there, yet it is worth noting.

Apple and AT&T playing favorites with App Store?

Apple and AT&T playing favorites with App Store? Apple rejected a unique version about the application Sling submitted to the App Store that required use of the phone's 3G service, as reported by Sling. It seemed to be subsequently approved when it was eventually modified so that it will just use local Wi-Fi hot spots. Apple's exact function of rejecting can be clear. There are lots of video- and audio-streaming applications available today in Apple's App Store, from smaller streaming services like Orb and Last.fm (owned by CNET News publisher CBS Interactive), and heavyweights like MLB.com's At Bat, CBS' TV.com, and YouTube.

While Apple has not necessarily been shy about exercising its veto management of App Store applications--just ask Trent Reznor, for example--it's unclear why Sling's streaming video service features been treated differently from, say, the YouTube app (owned by Apple-friendly Google), which was located on the iPhone simply because device's launch.

Apple did not deal with requests for comment about why a perfect Wi-Fi version of SlingPlayer was approved. However it really appears the rejection also happens to be at AT&T's behest. At the beginning of April, AT&T changed its terms of use for wireless customers, stating that redirecting TV video or audio signals--as the SlingPlayer does--was mystery allowed on its network. After a public outcry, AT&T quickly reversed its decision, citing "a mistake." Merchandise online the previous week the issuer reinstated the ban inside the TOS.

Then on Friday, AT&T mobility spokesman Mark Siegel began the Clark Howard radio show and extremely clearly announced "Slinging"--the operation of accessing a TV Burberry iPhone 5 Case signal by a Slingbox through a remote computer--was banned located on the company's network.

Siegel compared using Sling's service accross a wireless link with sending bulk e-mail and spam, activities which he said take excessive network's bandwidth. "You can't ideally, use a service called 'Slinging,' in which you redirect a radio TV signal to one's phone. Nobody needs to allow that variety of application on our phones," he said. "It's absolutely cool (technology), when we allowed many of these services, the highway would quickly become clogged."

SlingPlayer for iPhone

(Credit:Screenshot by Erica Ogg/CNET)

He confirmed again to CNET News on Tuesday that AT&T believes the SlingPlayer app would opt for more bandwidth of computer should. To generally be fair AT&T has a legitimate point. Streaming video utilizes a number of bandwidth. Because cellular networks are divided into cells, users inside the particular cell share possible bandwidth for the reason that cell or region. So users streaming quite a few high-quality video during the network may eat up each one of the available bandwidth and degrade service for other subscribers in this cell.

But you will find there's slight disconnect in doing what AT&T is saying and how it's doing: Other 3G smartphones that are powered by AT&T's network may use the SlingPlayer. For illustration, the SlingPlayer creates several BlackBerry devices, the BlackBerry Bold, BlackBerry Pearl 8120, BlackBerry Curve 8320, and so the BlackBerry 8820. Users can download the mobile SlingPlayer application completely from the Sling Media Internet site onto their phones.

Siegel says that AT&T's relation to use are Louis vuitton ipad case evident if you're considering the SlingPlayer the particular husband points too anyone downloading these applications onto a smartphone as replacements over its 3G network is either violation among the company's comparison to its use.

Bandwidth usage is seen as a legitimate concern in the case of SlingPlayer. The application was made to give best quality video experience depending on how much bandwidth is offered. But Dave Eyler, product manager for mobile at Sling Media, announced that the most popular version of an SlingPlayer submitted to Apple for that App Store capped the bit rate to confirm it seemed to be below Apple's and AT&T's threshold. He was quoted saying that application actually operates on the little less bandwidth than TV.com's application.

"Our latest application, which has been submitted for App Store, is inside of the organization bit rate that Apple has looking for these sort of applications," he Gucci Galaxy S3 Case explained. "And judgement below examples of the apps which happen to have happen to be approved within the App Store."

So why won't Apple permit SlingPlayer on your iPhone specifically over AT&T's network when it doesn't eat up any further bandwidth than other video applications which use been really approved by Apple?

That's the right question. Eyler said there couldn't given to his team was that AT&T doesn't allow video services that redirect TV signals onto their network. But interestingly, OrbLive, that is definitely offered over the App Store, also redirects TV signals into the iPhone. The software was created to allow people to stream media at a PC to your iPhone wirelessly. Along with the company's web portal explicitly states living TV might streamed over 3G, Wi-Fi, and even slower 2.5G EDGE network, when someone is using a TV tuner card as part of the PC. This essentially "turns your iPhone oriPod touch into an on-demand media center," the place says.

OrbLive's application sounds similar to how much the SlingPlayer does. Eyler admits everything is confusing as well as bit frustrating. But he says the manufacturer isn't getting too bent off form about things.

"We think our app is awesome," he explained. "There is much Wi-Fi obtainable. Without doubt, we'd like that it is on a 3G network, the many innovations ultimately our goal. But really do not have details about the selection process."

Update 11:02 a.m. PDT: This still leaves the question of why. Sling was bought by EchoStar, those who own Dish Network, in 2007. Sling sells standalone Slingboxes, but Dish Network now also has integrated Slingbox capabilities in their combination satellite TV/DVR boxes. Which means AT&T and Echostar both sell TV subscription services with DVR capabilities. But Dish's product can be considered by some consumers that needs to be superior in the Sling capability. Handicapping that capability along the iPhone would cut into that perceived superiority. It's unclear if there is also a direct connection there, it can be worth noting.

Apple applies for photo-correcting patent

Apple applies for photo-correcting patent Apple applied for a patent today for technology to train on a mobile device's orientation sensors to help you correct common photo problems.

One claim while in nexus 4 case the patent application involves using gyroscopes, compasses, or accelerometers to check a device's orientation, then by using their data to correct problems possibly tilt who is going to keep a horizontal line from being level.

A related claim involves a correction to distortion which could be caused each time a camera isn't held vertically--for example any time a view seeking helps make the parallel vertical lines in the building converge. Here, a distance measurement in direction of the subject can be considered, too.

A photo may possibly corrected either after best nexus 4 case it was eventually taken or quickly because it is being taken.

The application is often a new twist on hardware fixes for common photography problems. Modern old cameras can move sensors or lens elements to counteract camera shake, and cameras or comptuer software can correct optical shortcomings of lenses. Start-up Lytro even hopes focusing errors are avoided with light-field technology that lets people focus shots after they're taken. Smile detection technology can snap a picture as long as the thing the whites of their total teeth, and face detection helps set exposure and concentration.

TheiPhone 4, by using a backside-illumination sensor that's nexus 4 wallet case more sensitive than conventional models, is highly taken into consideration phone cameras go, and it's highly used, too, topping Flickr's camera usage charts. Probably Apple prefer to help its customers avoid those embarrassingly tilted oceans.

Now all we start to use is technology make certain camera subjects look as healthy, vivacious, and exquisite as lots of people in Apple's promotional illustrations.

Apple made to change name of iPad Wi-Fi + 4G

Apple made to change name of iPad Wi-Fi + 4G Every occasion I see "4G" thankfully temptation to wonder what it truly means.

However, around australia in addition to countries, many appear to have been upset for long periods after Apple'siPad Wi-Fi version was called "iPad Wi-Fi + 4G."

Their complaints were naturally complicated and technical, but boiled down to the present: It's not necessarily.

More precisely, truly can not work on, say. Australian LTE networks, because they are about the 1800MHz spectrum, instead of 700MHz. Aforementioned is always occupied by analog TV.

More Technically IncorrectSam's Club in unintentionally hilarious Twitter exchangeHow to organize yourself for Friday's apocalypseCop involved in buying nexus 4 best nexus 4 case bumper $15 iPhone -- from undercover copPolice on Apple store tasering: It has been 'justified'How I dodged a bullet to accept a pic of McAfee

So Thx to 9to5Mac for saying that Apple will quickly affect the name.

It can be that your chosen objections of one's Australian government became hard for Apple to disregard. Even legal fees begun to mount unreasonably.

The new name is iPad Wi-Fi + Cellular, a nomenclature that has emerged at Apple.com in recent days.

The change nexus 4 case bumper appears to have been spotted in lots of countries, but not, to provide an example, in my beloved Poland, in which the 4G still reigns.

Apple haven't commented publicly in the name change.

However, around australia, Apple features a clarification on its iPad page. It reads: "This product supports very quick cellular networks. It is not necessarily suitable for current Australian 4G LTE networks and WiMAX networks."

I am sure most will desire to parse the implications found that sentence.

Todays Apple website in Poland.

(Credit:Screenshot: Chris Matyszczyk/CNET)

Apple branching in 2009?

Apple branching in 2009? Familiar Apple rumors earning the rounds again today as Macworld looms while in the distance, 1 month away.

Trip Chowdhry of Global Equities Research produced a study note Monday morning spotted nexus 4 bumper case by D: As much as possible Digital saying that Apple offers to release something from "a unique device category" the next time werrrll. He does not nexus 4 bumper explain specifically what that of a product might encompass, but speculates that it will be based around a processor manufactured by the former P.A. Semi engineering team.

Consequently, the usual rumors (Mac tablet, iPhone Nano, iKindle) they are under discussion within theMac universe. Chowdhry believes that Apple patent filings will likely be released at the outset of 2009 that might make everything clear, and in addition notes that P.A. Semi ought to have an apple iphone chip out Nexus 4 Leather Case around this time that improves performance and battery.

Recording CEO Jobs implied Apple was watching small-device categories liketablets and Netbooks to ascertain if they really grow being a mega-trend, but in the meantime the business had other priorities. Mac tablet rumors stretch back for some time, and within days gone by Jobs has quickly shot down talk of one's Apple-produced competitor to Amazon's Kindle, that is interpreted as an effective sign Apple was doing that.

Apple is constantly dominate mobile PC, tablet markets

Apple is constantly dominate mobile PC, tablet markets Apple'siPad helped catapult the corporate reach the top of a mobile PC space last quarter, as stated by new data from NPD DisplaySearch.

The research firm revealed nexus 4 case today that usually in the first quarter, Apple shipped 17.2 million mobile PCs worldwide, earning it 22.5 percent share of the market and jumping 118 percent year-over-year. Hewlett-Packard and Acer trailed with 11.6 percent and 9 percent market share, respectively. Lenovo and Dell rounded your top five with 7.7 percent and 7.3 % share.

NPD DisplaySearch, which defines mobile PCs astablets, notebooks, and mini-notebooks, said total shipments for that quarter hit 76.Two million, representing a 30 % gain over the same period a year ago.

Related storiesThe desolate man AppleApple rumors nexus 4 bumper never ceaseDropbox for iOS updated with target photosA&E launches iPad apps with free authority to access full episodesAnalyst: iPad, iPhone, Apple to feel squeeze in 2013

Apple's dominance extended in to the tablet market, while the company shipped 13.Six million iPads while in the first quarter, in accordance with NPD DisplaySearch. Recover many tablets shipped, they easily dwarfed all competitors in market share, taking 62.8 percent within the space. Samsung and Amazon trailed far behind with 7.5 percent and 4 percent market share, respectively.

Although Apple's success was nexus 4 case bumper due mainly to its iPad's popularity, NPD revealed within its study the company's competitors weren't necessarily so interested in preserving market share. In reality, HP was "one with the few top players seem to increase its unit shipments year-over-year," NPD said. Rather then increasing shipments, NPD said, mobile PC vendors focused their efforts on "margins and profits."

Still, adidas and puma were able to slowly chip away at Apple's lead. Throughout the fourth quarter of 2011, Apple owned 26.6 percent within the global mobile PC market. HP, which had been in second place, had only 9.9 percent share.

Apple gambling on Papermaster's leadership skills

Apple gambling on Papermaster's leadership skills Apple knew full well that Mark Papermaster might need to learn his new role asiPod and iPhone chief "on the job" when it hired him.

Papermaster's former employer, IBM, filed a lawsuit against him the previous week, claiming he broke the comparison to its a noncompete contract with IBM in accepting a high-profile job with Apple. InformationWeek spotted Papermaster's formal response Friday morning, from which he declares that your chosen two companies won't be competitors knowning that his experience at IBM isn't primary good reason why Apple sought his services.

The judge filings reveal the interesting process Apple seemed to hire Papermaster to interchange Tony Fadell, a longtime executive in command of Apple's iPod group. And in contrast to speculation, it appears that Papermaster--a well-respected chip executive--will don't have anything to do with chip design at Apple on Day 1.

News.com Poll

Apple began searching at the gadgets industry in October 2007 for that lieutenant and eventual successor to Fadell, however it really couldn't find anyone it liked, per irs court filing. Instead, the merchant decided i would look up a professional with strong overall technology skills would you be described as a good fit inside Apple, modeling the look on consumer credit card debt utilized to find current Mac hardware leader Bob Mansfield.

Mansfield was the one that suggested Papermaster getting candidate, though he didn't exactly reveal the welcome mat for his college buddy. Over a range of potential candidates provided for Second in command of Time Danielle Lambert (who has married to Fadell), Mansfield described Papermaster: "Mark fits the bill wrt (for) systems and semiconductor understanding, but also in another way is an extended shot."

Nonetheless, he was brought into Cupertino in February 2008 to interview with CEO Steve Jobs and Fadell. Apple liked Papermaster in many ways, though it wasn't sure that his expertise in server development was the perfect background on your role--especially in light of the truth that in February, Apple was spending so much time on the iPhone 3G on your way, therefore wanted someone could hit the ground running.

However, as Lambert said inside a statement attached with Papermaster's response, "nobody questioned Mark's chance to lead a team of developers." The provider offered him a role designing laptops, and though Papermaster was intrigued by a 2 suns working at Apple, he wasn't all in love with that you role.

But after Apple got the 2010 crop of iPods out of the door in September, searching for Fadell's replacement intensified. Papermaster was offered that role, as well as jumped at what he called "the opportunity a person can have."

As Papermaster sees it, his role is pretty narrow: he's tasked with overseeing enhancing iPod and iPhone hardware. He probably will not be repairing pcs, he is definately not practicing servers, as well as most surprisingly, he shouldn't get implementing microprocesors.

Papermaster's court filing says the P.A. Semi team acquired by Apple a few months ago is an element with the group managed by Mansfield, not primary ipod group. nexus 4 case bumper Do you surprising organizational decision, because Jobs states publicly that P.A. Semi was brought directly into the fold to exert effort on chips for that iPhone and iPod Touch.

Despite a profession spent developing chips at IBM, Papermaster supposedly wont have everything to do with Apples nexus 4 bumper budding chip team.

(Credit:CNET)

The filing notes that Apple currently acquires iPhone microprocessors from another vendor, widely believed to be Samsung. Unsurprisingly, it stops in need of mentioning regardless of Apple wants to eventually design and develop distinctive microprocessors towards the product, as seems evident.

In any declaration accompanying the formal court response, Papermaster notes that "it can be my knowning that I will not cause developing the microprocessors that is used for ipod and iphone and iPhone products, instead those will undoubtedly be procured from sources outside my group." Whether those sources are outside Papermaster's group but inside Apple is left unstated, but Papermaster also says, "I shall be acting solely to provide a product manager--I am not being hired to make technology across product lines."

An Apple representative declined to comment on Apple's organizational structure or even the court filings, and then say, "We think IBM notice the iPod and iPhone fail to be competitive with the business." IBM likewise declined to discuss Papermaster's response in the evening statements these have made regarding their intention to "vigorously" pursue possible against Papermaster.

Papermaster's argument contrary to the lawsuit is that since Apple and IBM aren't true competitors, and also, since he is not performing on the insufficient slice of Apple's business--servers--that does overlap with IBM's business, the noncompete donrrrt want to apply. Likewise, he believes that he isn't to be able to divulge any IBM trade secrets because "Mr. Papermaster's position at Apple involves a very different product using different technology that Mr. Papermaster will probably need to learn on it."

It's quite fairly likely that Papermaster's lawyers are deliberately downplaying his connections to Apple's budding chip design team to make this lawsuit depart, due to the fact chip angle is IBM's main argument. If Papermaster isn't directly involved about the day-to-day basis because of the P.A. Semi team, he will be using specifying the hardware requirements on your iPhone, and percentage of that also includes the chips which are into that system.

Apple looks like preparing a small risk this hire, entrusting the care of what has become its most prominent product into an executive who, though well-regarded, does not have experience working with the fast-paced electronics industry. Also, the most recent portion of his IBM experience doesn't cute Nexus 4 case could be seen as portion of his marching orders at Apple.

However the company believes that his leadership skills will serve him well at Apple, as documented in one of these court filings: "Apple has hired Mark Papermaster because he has strong general engineering skills, rrs definitely an outstanding leader, because we predict he'll be a solid cultural match at Apple."

Apple hit by patent suit over Passbook

Apple hit by nexus 4 bumper case patent suit over Passbook Apple is within the middle of some other lawsuit, this blog over charges what has Passbook app violates several patents of software developer Ameranth.

In the court document, Ameranth, which sells software and services on the hospitality and gaming industry, claims that Passbook violates four of the U.S. patents -- No. 6,384,850, No. 6,871,325, No. 6,982,733, and zero. 8,146,077.

All four patents focus on nexus 4 case bumper "Information management and synchronous communications system." As a, they cover option to synchronize data among wired, wireless, and Web-based systems for electronic menus and reservations for such businesses as restaurants.

Introduced iniOS 6, Apple's Passbook app lets users synchronize and save electronic copies of tickets, boarding passes, loyalty cards, and coupons.

In its suit, Ameranth cites Passbook's power to download and store "airline boarding passes, hotel case for nexus 4 reservations, movie tickets, and event tickets" and claims that Apple comprehends the patents allegedly being violated.

"One for the Ameranth patents-in-suit, U.S. Patent No. 6,384,850 -- 1st patent issued with this Ameranth patent family -- was cited as being a prior art reference into two Iphone 4g patents issued to named inventors Bas Ording and Steven P. Jobs," the agency produced in its court filing. "Also, three in the patents in our Ameranth patent family are asserted in a lot of patent enforcement actions against Apple partners."

Related storiesGetting started with Passbook on iOS 6Giving Apple's Passbook a real-world spinStarbucks: We'll be Passbook-ready before OctoberiOS 6 Passbook vs. Google Wallet

Ameranth says it's in need of triple as much damages that barefoot running has sustainted because of a Apple's infringement.

Ameranth are very few stranger towards the patent courts.

In July, the business filed patent lawsuits against several hotels, travel sites, and ticketing companies, including Hilton, Marriott, Best Western, Travelocity, Kayak, Hotwire, Expedia, Orbitz, Ticketmaster, Stubhub, and Fandango.

Ameranth's web page displays a few of its patents and news briefs of latest patent agreements to other companies.

CNET contacted both Apple and Ameranth for comment and will definitely update situation as we have any information.

(Via AppleInsider)

Apple engineers creating ARM-based CPUs for iPhone

Apple engineers creating ARM-based CPUs for iPhone The magic of social networking has confirmed that Apple offers to make its own ARM-based google nexus 4 case processors for future versions cute Nexus 4 case with the iPhone.

The New york ny Times spotted the LinkedIn profile of Wei-han Lien, Apple's senior manager of CPU development, over the weekend. Lien's job description, in accordance with his profile, involves handling the ARM CPU design team for Apple, extra time of his previous just work at P.A. Semi.

The way to pretty clear for a long time that Apple bought P.A. Semi trapped on video tape to work on developing the liechtenstein chips for any iPhone, but like the Times points out, Apple never specifically stated that it planned to form CPUs: several different chips from a modern smartphone make use of a processor dependent on 1 of ARM's cores.

However, CEO Jobs did claim that Apple was aiming to possess engineers make "system-on-chips" in the iPhone, which suggests they had been tackling the whole package, CPU included. Another solid hint was the disappointment expressed by Intel's Pat Gelsinger over losing out on the plan win for that next-generation iPhone, along with Apple's apparent decision to secure an architectural license in the ARM core.

Apple earnings: $36B revenue, $8.2B profit, 26.9M iPhones, 14M iPads

Apple earnings: $36B revenue, $8.2B profit, 26.9M iPhones, 14M iPads Apple's knack for surprises held up in its quarterly earnings today.

The company narrowly beat expectations on revenue, but missed on profits.

Buoyed by sales for the iPhone andiPad, the provider reported revenue of $36 billion and profits of $8.2 billion, or $8.67 per share, towards quarter ended September 29.

Wall Street expected Apple to report $35.80 billion in sales, with earnings per share of $8.75. Apple's own forecast for the quarter was $34 billion, with earnings per share of $7.65.

"We're very proud to end a fantastic fiscal year with record September quarter results," Apple CEO Tim Cook said inside of a statement. "We're entering this season in the best iPhone, iPad,Mac, andiPod products ever, and in addition we remain very confident within your awesome product pipeline."

Apple sold 26.9 million iPhones, exceeding Wall Street's estimate of 25 million, or over 58 percent using the same quarter recently. The issuer for you to disclose how many of that tally were iPhone 5s. Your handmade jewelry only agreed to be on sale for nine days prior to an quarter ended.

Related stories:Apple sees Q1 EPS of $11.75, sales of $52B, lighter than expectedApple sells 26.9 million iPhones in last quarter, up 58% inside yeariPad sales miss estimates as rate of adoption slows

The iPad was Apple's runner-up in sales. Apple said hello sold 14 million on the tablets, case for nexus 4 that has been well below from the best nexus 4 case 17 to 18 million analysts were expecting. However many analysts cut their forecasts for a tablet shortly after Apple's iPad Mini event the 2009 week. That came after Apple said hello had sold a lot more than 100 million from the devices cumulatively, which put most estimates better 16 million and below on the quarter.

As far as Apple's other products go, Apple sold 4.9 million Macs, numerous that started in under its all-time record of 5.2 million Macs within the first quarter of 2011. The corporate also sold 5.3 million iPods, narrowly being under Wall Street's estimate of 5.6 000 0000 units.

Of note, Apple told me that international sales composed Sixty percent in the company's revenue of this quarter. That's down 2 percent coming from a previous quarter, and 3 percent via the same quarter not too long ago.

Apple, which happens to be headquartered in Cupertino, Calif., expects revenue of $52 billion and projected earnings of $11.75 per share due to its next quarter. That's below the $54.9 billion forecast by Wall Street.

In after-hours trading, Apple shares were trading at $613.28, up $3.48 or 0.57 percent.

Apple holds its conference call with analysts this morning at 2 p.m. Pacific nexus 4 bumper to talk about the data. CNET are likely to be live blogging it, and you can stay informed about it here:

Tune into CNET's live coverage of Apple's fourth quarter earnings call at 2 p.m. Pacific.

Updated at 1:48 p.m. PT to the most suitable revenue total within a first graf.